tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2696514072851165531.post6305741432390312213..comments2022-11-12T06:14:52.013-05:00Comments on Woman of the House: 2011 Reading Challenge ~ Book #32Woman of the Househttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13281605927650100295noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2696514072851165531.post-82626703730271125452011-09-06T08:58:32.482-04:002011-09-06T08:58:32.482-04:00Yes, well said! "It is a fun book to dip int...Yes, well said! "It is a fun book to dip into now and again but not one to live by" ~ wish I had said that! Thanks for clarifying that for me.Woman of the Househttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13281605927650100295noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2696514072851165531.post-85060269238975656312011-09-06T08:19:06.626-04:002011-09-06T08:19:06.626-04:00I've been meaning to respond to this. I agree...I've been meaning to respond to this. I agree that McGinley and Peterson's books were more thought provoking. Every time I read them I think more deeply about *why* I do what I do and *how* that works out on a daily basis. Brocket's book is very different. I enjoy similar activities and novels so those parts were fun. She is much more creative than I am and so I think I'm mostly inspired by her creativity. Her bright colors are fun to look at but I couldn't live with most of them. All in all, it is a fun book to dip into now and again but not one to live by, if that makes sense. I have to run and start school now but wanted to get back to this first. Have a grand day!jlthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01293720624466655384noreply@blogger.com